The biggest monitor makers today are offering their G-Sync monitors for a fairly respectable price but with the Asus ROG Swift selling for $799, that’s still a high order for most average gamers. If you’re one of those gamers who’re looking for cheaper alternatives to the Asus 27″ gaming monitor, you’ll be happy to know that both Phillips and BenQ are in the market as well.
Their equivalents of the ROG Swift cost as low as $600, which is approximately 20% cheaper. It’s a great buy if you’re not too concerned about the extra polishes that the Asus gaming monitor has over these low-cost versions. For instance, the bezel that the ROG Swift has is extremely thin and putting all 3 of them together for a multi-display gaming system has never looked better. In fact, with its G-Sync capability, you’ll be hard pressed to find any screen tearing at all, even across 3 simultaneous displays.
While I wouldn’t call such a gaming monitor a must-have, it’s certainly a huge upgrade over non-G-Sync monitors. As for must-have gaming monitors, check out the best monitors here. After all, if you’re a serious first person shooter gamer, it is essential that you have minimal or zero display lag since it offers you a huge advantage over other players online. This is hardly achievable with the older or more conventional gaming monitors simply because V-Sync does introduce some input lag in relation to this. Sure, you could easily turn V-Sync off and set your pre-rendered frames to 0 for maximum responsiveness, but at what cost? The excessive screen tearing could also catch you off-guard as your enemies will seem to split into two parts as you struggle to determine what their real positions are.
Interestingly, 27″ gaming monitors seem to suffer from this effect to a larger degree. Basically, if a monitor is required to display frames that are fast-moving, and more pixels have to be drawn on the screen, it can be difficult for your graphics card in your PC to catch up. G-Sync basically eliminates all of these problems and more.
It will be quite a feat for AMD to match up their new but similar technology that they’d called FreeSync. Currently, only their graphics card series (and even then, only the R7 and 9) are compatible with such an interface. Again, much like the G-Sync, the only port that works with this technology is the DisplayPort. Despite this lack of flexibility, I’m personally pumped up to see what the future monitor industry offers for us gamers, in the hopes that these gaming monitor prices will fall so that the average gamer like myself can afford one without having to fork out 2 months worth of our rent.